About Us | The BFR Pros | Blood Flow Restriction Professionals

Skip to content

WHAT IS BFR
BFR WORKSHOPS
MEDIA
ABOUT US
BFR: BETTER FOR RESULTS^TM STORE

Register For BFR Tips

GROW YOUR BUSINESS
WITH BFR TRAINING

Together let’s all do our part to make this world a better, happier place!

THE BFR PROS BLOGS

Login / Register

Events

thebfrpros

BFR IMPROVES SKELETAL MUSCLE OXIDATIVE CAPACITY B

BFR IMPROVES SKELETAL MUSCLE OXIDATIVE CAPACITY

BFR - NOT IF - WHEN

Even as early as 1990, evidence of the benefits of local ischemic exercise (applied with a pressure chamber to reduce arterial inflow) has been known. This graph, from Kaijser et al. (1990) is the result of a 4x per week, 4 week training program where 8 males exercised one leg in ischemia to exhaustion at the maximal tolerable ischemic pain (yeah- that's painful indeed!!!) and the other leg did the same workload to serve as the control. While this is an exaggerated example of the benefits of ischemic exercise, the results showed a ~25% increase in exercise duration to failure in the ischemic leg during local ischemia and a ~19% increase in duration when exercising in normal atmospheric conditions. While both groups improved in their time to failure, the ischemic exercise leg improved significantly more in ischemic exercise and was trending towards a higher improvement in normal exercise conditions. Further, citrate synthase activity was higher post-training in the ischemic leg indicating improved mitochondrial function. Pair that with a reduction in lactate dehydrogenase activity in the ischemic leg post-training and the authors conclude greater local muscle oxidative capacity. Interesting to note there was a degree of specificity in the adaptations...

Want to learn how to change lives and grow your business? We've created an on-demand,online course that over 300+ clinicians and coaches have taken since launching in September!

Don't be left behind! Sign up through our link in the bio to learn more. Subscribe to our e-mail list and get your FREE BFR Ultimate Training Guide and keep up to date with all things BFR!

SOURCE: Kaijser, L., Sundberg, C. J., Eiken, O., Nygren, A., Esbjornsson, M., Sylven, C., & Jansson, E. (1990). Muscle oxidative capacity and work performance after training under local leg ischemia. Journal of Applied Physiology, 69(2), 785–787. doi:10.1152/jappl.1990.69.2.785

LOP CHANGES AS A FUNCTION OF CUFF WIDTH BFR - NOT

LOP CHANGES AS A FUNCTION OF CUFF WIDTH

BFR - NOT IF - BUT WHEN!

Limb occlusion pressure, or LOP is the minimum pressure needed to completely restrict both venous and arterial flow to the limb. Exercise is commonly performed at a percentage of LOP (40-80%). LOP has been shown to vary significantly with the cuff width. Wider cuffs tend to occlude at lower LOPs than narrow cuffs. Further, there is a concern about narrow cuffs increasing the risk of nerve damage due to the higher applied pressures and greater pressure gradients (due to less width to disperse the pressures).
The thought is that use of excessively narrow cuffs may be dangerous to the nervous tissue. Paradoxically, despite the lower applied pressures, wider cuffs (14 cm) have been shown to induce a greater disruption in the nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve (Mittal, 2008) than narrow cuffs (7 cm) likely a result of the greater amount of nervous tissue compressed. Large decreases in nerve conduction velocities show reduced functioning of the nerve, so this is something to consider when exercising with BFR. However, a near fatal limitation in the Mittal study was that both cuffs were not inflated to a personalized pressure, so this difference in median nerve function is still TBD.

Want to learn how to change lives and grow your business? We've created an on-demand,online course that over 300+ clinicians and coaches have taken since launching in September!

Don't be left behind! Sign up through our link in the bio to learn more. Subscribe to our e-mail list and get your FREE BFR Ultimate Training Guide and keep up to date with all things BFR!

SOURCE: Mittal et al.
Effect of different cuff widths on the motor nerve conduction of the median nerve: an experimental study

Our (@msccerqueira) Letter to the Editor on a rece

Our (@msccerqueira) Letter to the Editor on a recent BFR training study (Bordessa et al. 2021) that aimed to assess comparative effectiveness has been published online ahead of print. This letter was necessary because as BFR training continues to grow, it's important that the researchers themselves design studies that actually help make clinical decision-making easier when deciding between different manufactured devices.
In short - researchers need to be familiar with cuff designs before attempting to make comparisons between different devices. Further, use of muscle activation is a poor indicator of acute stress when fatiguing exercise is used. Better designed studies can help clinicians/coaches/fitness professionals understand how the BFR stress influences acute- and long-term outcomes. However, this study just wasn't a design that helps us understand all too much about "comparative effectiveness."

Thoughts on the paper? Our response? Post below!!

UNDERSTANDING COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS A recent

UNDERSTANDING COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS

A recent article was published attempting to draw comparative effectiveness between a Delfi device, Bstrong device and heavy load training. It is awesome to see new research like this published as BFR training continues to grow and more people begin to use it in their practice. However, the design of this study was not set up to really conclude much of anything (unfortunately). This is likely because of the over-reliance on surface EMG to determine hypertrophic potential and a misunderstanding of the different types of BFR devices out on the market. This letter to the editor describes some of the shortcomings of the design while offering suggestions to improve these study designs in the future.

Thanks to @msccerqueira for the collaboration on this letter. We hope that this is the beginning of an amazing sub-topic in the BFR literature and thank the authors of Bordessa et al. for their preliminary dive into this area.

Hope this letter drives some discussion and furthers better research designs so we can understand BFR even more!

Load More... Follow on Instagram

Privacy Policy | Refund Policy | Non-Discrimination Policy | Disclaimer | Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2021 THE BFR PROS | Powered by THE BFR PROS

0